<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Depth profiles for various water quality parameters at El Potrero (type locality for Prietella phreatophila)</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>

<P ALIGN=center>
<H1>Depth profiles for various water quality parameters at El Potrero (type locality for <I>Prietella phreatophila</I>)</H1>

At this locality, two points of access to subterranean waters were explored. Flow was not discernible at either site, and water was not discharging to the surface at either (though it does so during floods at both sites).<p> 
<OL>
<LI>Potrero 1 - on the west (?) side of the canyon is what is presumably the type locality of <I>P. phreatophila</I>, in a steeply dipping and narrow fracture which could be penetrated by divers only to a depth of XX m. This site is heavily pumped for wat
er for the coal washing plant in nearby Palau. Water quality in this site was taken from the surface only.<p>
<LI>Potrero 2 - on the east (?) side of the canyon, and slightly downstream from the presumed type locality (Potrero 1) is a now-covered cave. Upon lifting the steel trap door, one enters a pool of water, followed by a short dry cave, which then drops bac
k into water. This is a solution channel, not a fracture like is found across the arroyo at the type locality.
</OL>




<p>

<p>

<TABLE WIDTH=90% ALIGN=center BORDER=2>
<CAPTION ALIGN=top>
Water quality for El Potrero 2 (east side of the arroyo)at El Potrero, near Melchor M&uacute;zquiz, Coahuila. Clic
k on any graph for a larger image.</CAPTION>
<TR ALIGN=center VALIGN=middle>
<TD ALIGN=center VALIGN=middle>Temperature<br><A HREF="p2-temp.gif"><IMG SRC="s_p2-tem.gif" ALT="temperature bar
chart"></A></TD>
<TD ALIGN=center VALIGN=middle>Specific conductance<br><A HREF="p2-spcon.gif"><IMG SRC="s_p2-spc.gif" ALT="specific
conductance throughout course of the dive"></A></TD>
</TR>

<TR ALIGN=center VALIGN=middle>
<TD ALIGN=center VALIGN=middle>pH<br><A HREF="p2-ph.gif"><IMG SRC="s_p2-ph.gif" ALT="pH throughout course of the dive"></A></TD>
<TD ALIGN=center VALIGN=middle>Dissolved Oxygen<br><A HREF="p2-do.gif"><IMG SRC="s_p2-do.gif" ALT="Dissolved Oxygen throughout course of the dive"></A></TD>
</TR>

<TR ALIGN=center VALIGN=middle>
<TD ALIGN=center VALIGN=middle>Redox Potential<br><A HREF="p2-redox.gif"><IMG SRC="s_p2-red.gif" ALT="Redox Potential throughout course of the dive"></A></TD>

<TD ALIGN=center VALIGN=middle>Time / depth profile of the dive<br><A HREF="p2-time.gif"><IMG SRC="s_p2-tim.gif" ALT="Time / depth profile of the dive"></A></TD>
</TR>


</TABLE>


<p>
We thus conclude:

<OL>
<LI>Waters in Potrero 1 and Potrero 2 are distinctly different.
<LI>Potrero 2 contains at least 2 water masses: a homogeneous surface layer
extending to 3.6 m depth and a transition layer from 3.7 to at least 5.4 m
or more.  Presumably, if the cave extended to even deeper depths, a
homogeneous layer would be encountered below the transition layer as was
the case with <a href="../rio_frio/">Rio Frio</a>.
<LI>Comparison of how parameters change between shallow and deep water
masses in <a href="../rio_frio/">Rio Frio</a> and Potrero 2 show similarities and differences as follows:<p>

<TABLE WIDTH=90% ALIGN=center BORDER>
<CAPTION><B>Comparison of Rio Frio cave and El Potrero 2</B></CAPTION>
<TR ALIGN=center VALIGN=middle>
<TD ALIGN=center VALIGN=middle></TD>
<TD ALIGN=center VALIGN=middle COLSPAN=2><B>R&iacute;o Frio</B></TD>
<TD ALIGN=center VALIGN=middle COLSPAN=2><B>Potrero 2</B></TD></TR>
<TR><TD ALIGN=center VALIGN=middle></TD>
<TD ALIGN=center VALIGN=middle><B>Shallow</B></TD>
<TD ALIGN=center VALIGN=middle><B>Deep</B></TD>
<TD ALIGN=center VALIGN=middle><B>Shallow</B></TD>
<TD ALIGN=center VALIGN=middle><B>Deep</B></TD>
</B></TR>

<TR><TD ALIGN=center VALIGN=middle><B>Temperature</B></TD>
<TD ALIGN=center VALIGN=middle>Cooler</TD>
<TD ALIGN=center VALIGN=middle>Warmer</TD>
<TD ALIGN=center VALIGN=middle>Warmer</TD>
<TD ALIGN=center VALIGN=middle>Cooler</TD>
</TR>

<TR><TD ALIGN=center VALIGN=middle><B>pH</B></TD>
<TD ALIGN=center VALIGN=middle>Higher</TD>
<TD ALIGN=center VALIGN=middle>Lower</TD>
<TD ALIGN=center VALIGN=middle>Higher</TD>
<TD ALIGN=center VALIGN=middle>Lower</TD>
</TR>

<TR><TD ALIGN=center VALIGN=middle><B>Specific Conductance</B></TD>
<TD ALIGN=center VALIGN=middle>Lower</TD>
<TD ALIGN=center VALIGN=middle>Higher</TD>
<TD ALIGN=center VALIGN=middle>Lower</TD>
<TD ALIGN=center VALIGN=middle>Higher</TD>
</TR>


<TR><TD ALIGN=center VALIGN=middle><B>Dissolved Oxygen</B></TD>
<TD ALIGN=center VALIGN=middle>Lower</TD>
<TD ALIGN=center VALIGN=middle>Higher</TD>
<TD ALIGN=center VALIGN=middle>Higher</TD>
<TD ALIGN=center VALIGN=middle>Lower</TD>
</TR>


<TR><TD ALIGN=center VALIGN=middle><B>Redox Potential</B></TD>
<TD ALIGN=center VALIGN=middle>Lower</TD>
<TD ALIGN=center VALIGN=middle>Higher</TD>
<TD ALIGN=center VALIGN=middle>Lower</TD>
<TD ALIGN=center VALIGN=middle>Higher</TD>
</TR>

</TABLE>

<p>
Thus, direction of change with depth for pH, specific conductance and redox
are the same for the two caves, while temperature and dissolved oxygen move
in opposite directions for Rio Frio and Potrero 2.

</BODY>
</HTML>
