2. Signal transduction and temperature-dependent sex determination
(NSF IBN-9723617)
Because of its categorical nature, sex determination
has become a model for understanding development in general. Further,
sex determination is a case study in how evolution has produced very
different mechanisms for achieving the same end. Here I take advantage
of the fact that in many reptiles the sex of the offspring depends
on the incubation temperature of the egg, a process known as environmental
sex determination (c.f., 180, 187, and 215). One question concerns
how the physical stimulus of temperature is transduced into a physiological
stimulus that operates ultimately at a molecular level to determine
an individuals gonadal sex. In this work I use the red-eared
slider turtle as the animal model system. I have demonstrated that
sex steroid hormones are the physiological equivalent of incubation
temperature, serving as the proximate trigger for male and female
sex determination. Temperature appears to accomplish this end by acting
on genes coding for steroidogenic enzymes (e.g., steroidogenic factor
1 and aromatase) and sex steroid hormone receptors (e.g., estrogen
and androgen receptors)(e.g., 232 and 258). Phylogenetic analysis
indicates that temperature-dependent sex determination is the precursor
of sex determination by genotypic mechanisms (e.g., sex chromosomes).
There is suggestive evidence that similar dynamics are present in
mammalian and avian species but are masked by homeothermy (e.g., 192
and 215).
This work has also contributed to new paradigms for
understanding sexuality (c.f., 54, 180, 191, 209, 225, 231, 251, and
254). For example, working with animals that lack sex-linked sex determining
genes has reinforced the conclusion that the molecular cascades that
lead to males and females are contained in each individual. That is,
the species may differ in their patterns of regulation, but the genes
associated with sex determination are conserved. What differs is the
trigger; in some it is sex chromosomes at fertilization, in others
it is environmental factors during embryogenesis, and still others
it is the social context the adult might find itself. This is overturning
the classic paradigm idea of an "organized and a "default"
sex; rather we now regard both sexes as organized and the question
now becomes why the activation of one cascade (e.g., the ovary-determining
cascade) actively suppresses the complementary sex determining cascade?
Further, I have put forward another paradigm to take the place of
the organized-default concept, namely that the female is the ancestral
sex and the male the derived sex. This leads to a new concept, namely
why might males be more like females, than females are like males?
The utility of this concept is becoming apparent as we continue to
gather evidence for gender differences in genetic and mental disorders.
|
|