Douglas Browning: Rankings: Philosophy
- The two greatest philosophers
-
- 1. Aristotle
- 2. John Dewey
-
- Two philosophers almost as great
-
- 1. Friedrich Nietzsche
- 2. Alfred North Whitehead
-
- Several contenders
-
- 1. Leibniz
- 2. Plato
- 3. Kant
- 4. Hegel
- 5. Descartes
- 6. Socrates
- 7. Locke
- 8. Berkeley
- 9. James
- 10. Brentano
-
- Some other philosophers whom I admire greatly
-
- 1. Jose Ortega y Gasset
- 2. Martin Buber
- 3. Ernst Cassirer
- 4. Anaximander
- 5. Heraclitus
- 6. Bergson
-
- The nine most overrated philosophers in history (to qualify
the philosopher must be held in very high regard by a significantly
large number of philosophers today)
-
- 1. Plato (a great philosopher, no doubt, but not that great!)
- 2. Wittgenstein
- 3. Heidegger
- 4. Spinoza
- 5. Aquinas
- 6. Parmenides
- 7. Russell
- 8. Hume
- 9. Kant (ditto above remark on Plato)
-
- Some of the most underrated philosophers of great merit in
history (to qualifty the philosopher must be held in low regard
by a significantly large number of philosophers today)
-
- 1. Dewey (he might no longer be eligible; attitudes are changing)
- 2. Samuel Clarke
- 3. Charles Hartshorne
- 4. Meinong
- 5. Ortega y Gasset
- 6. Whitehead
- 8. Henri Bergson
-
- Some of the most overlooked philosophers of merit in history
(for a philosopher to qualify a suggestion of his or her merit
will evoke the response, "Who's she?" or "Do you
really consider him a philosopher?")
-
- 1. Martin Buber
- 2. John Balguy
- 3. Richard Price
- 4. George Herbert Mead
- 5. Bernard Bosanquet
- 6. Everett W. Hall
- 7. Ralph Cudworth
- 8. Joseph Butler
-
- Six philosophers whose compositional style in English I admire
-
- 1. Hobbes
- 2. H. A. Prichard
- 3. A. J. Ayer
- 4. Peter Strawson
- 5. William James
- 6. Berkeley
-
- Six philosophical writers in English whose compositional
expression leaves a lot to be desired
-
- 1. Simon Blackburn
- 2. Nelson Goodman
- 3. Richard Rorty
- 4. John McDowell
- 5. Hume
- 6. David Wiggins
Recently the Baruch College Philosophy Department
asked me and an untold number of philosophers across the country
to participate in the Baruch College Poll of great philosophy
in the twentieth century. Each of us were asked to list
what he or she judged to be the five most important books and
the five most important articles in philosophy in the century.
These instructions were included: "We are interested
in your judgment of what are the best philosophical books and
articles, not your estimate of what you consider the most influential."
I listed the following books, ranked in the order indicated:
- 1. John Dewey, Logic: The Theory of Inquiry
(1938)
- 2. Alfred North Whitehead, Process and Reality
(1929)
- 3. John Dewey, Experience and Nature (1925)T
- 4. Ernst Cassirer, The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms
(in three volumes, 1923-1929)
- 5. Jose Ortega y Gasset, Meditations of Quixote
(1914)
- Four others which I considered very carefully were:
- G. E. Moore, Principia Ethica
- Martin Buber, I and Thou
- Whitehead and Russell, Principia Mathematica
- William James, Essays in Radical Empiricism
-
- I must say that I was not shocked when I was informed on
July 13, 1999 of the five winners of the Baruch Poll of Great
Philosophy Books of the Twentieth Century. They were:
- 1. Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations
- 2. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time
- 3. John Rawls, A Theory of Justice
- 4. Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
- 5. Bertrand Russell and A. N. Whitehead, Principia
Mathematica
-
- To be as charitable as I can, I would suggest that many voters
did not take the instructions seriously. Influential as
these books may be now and for some years to come perhaps, the
point was to list the best books. My cynicism deepens.
Home