Rich America, unfair America
Robert Jensen
Department of Journalism
University of Texas
Austin, TX 78712
work: (512) 471-1990
fax: (512) 471-7979
rjensen@uts.cc.utexas.edu
copyright Robert Jensen 2001
Newsday, May 29, 2001, p. 28-A.
by Robert Jensen
THE BIGGEST THREAT to democracy in the United States today is economic prosperity.
That observation isn't motivated by a desire to see people suffer, but rather
is a challenge to the celebration of a certain kind of prosperity, distributed
in a certain fashion, in the service of certain kinds of institutions, in
which it turns out lots of people don't do so well after all.
In a real democracy, one would expect economic growth and prosperity steadily
to shrink the gap between rich and poor so that eventually political equality
is mirrored in a rough kind of economic equality that can give people the
space and security to maximize use of their freedoms.
In a real democracy, one would expect the workplaces within which peoplespend
a third of their day to be participatory and, well, democratic.
Neither is the case in the contemporary United States, which means democracy
is in trouble.
From the late 1980s to the late 1990s, the average income of the lowest-income
families grew by less than 1 percent, while that of middle-income families
grew by less than 2 percent. But for high-income families, the growth was
15 percent, according to an analysis of Census Bureau data by the Centeron
Budget and Policy Priorities and the Economic Policy Institute.
One of the economists who helped write that report calls the unequal distribution
of wealth from the recent prosperity "our nation's most serious economicproblem,"
pointing to evidence that societies with higher levels of inequalitygrow
more slowly. Our government's only response has been to push massivetax cuts
that mostly benefit the rich.
The economy that produces the grotesque level of inequality is dominatedby
huge corporations that internally are structured like tyrannies-powerconcentrated
at the top, hierarchal management systems, and no freedom foremployees at
the bottom, except the "freedom" to leave to find a job in someequally tyrannical
competitor.
People, even those who often are loyal to corporations for which they work,
have few illusions about this, which is why a Business Week poll last summer
found that three-quarters of people agreed that "business has gained toomuch
power over too many aspects of American life." Apologists for the corporations
argue that the rich-getting-richer should be of no concern, so long as the
economy continues to grow and the poor-aren't-getting-poorer. The rich are
doing their job, this argument goes, by creating a dynamic economy that will,
in the end, help everyone.
That's a story that's been peddled to working people and the poor for a long
time and is no more compelling today than it ever was to folks at the bottom
who are working longer hours to try to hold on to their standard of living.
So, we have economic institutions built on anti-democratic principles that
produce inequalities that make democracy outside the workplace increasingly
difficult.
There is no denying that this economic system is very good at producing vast
numbers of products. There's also no denying that it is not very good atproducing
free and fulfilled human beings. Work is, for most people, somethingto be
endured, not a site for individual development or the enhancement ofcommunities.
Though the overtly corporate-hugging Republicans and the pseudo-populistcorporate-hugging
Democrats sometimes engage in rhetorical clashes, neitheris willing to speak
to a simple question: How can we have a meaningful democracyat home, or promote
democracy abroad, if we live most of our lives underthe thumbs of authoritarian
institutions that concentrate wealth and powerin the hands of the few to
the detriment of the many? Working people at theend of the last century understood
this as they fought what turned out tobe a losing battle to stem the emerging
power of large corporations. A centurylater, the basic struggle to democratize
America is no different.
Robert Jensen is a professor in the Department of Journalism at the University
of Texas at Austin. He can be reached at rjensen@uts.cc.utexas.edu. Other
writings are available online at http://uts.cc.utexas.edu/~rjensen/freelance/freelance.htm.
BACK
TO FREE-LANCE ARTICLES
BACK TO ROBERT W.JENSEN'S
HOME PAGE