Demonize,
disguise, divert: Pinning the blame on Newsweek
Robert Jensen
School of Journalism
University of Texas
Austin, TX 78712
work: (512) 471-1990
fax: (512) 471-7979
rjensen@uts.cc.utexas.edu
copyright Robert Jensen and Pat
Youngblood 2005
"What
a gift: Bush team exploits magazine's gaffe,"
Philadelphia Inquirer, May 18,
2005; and
"U.S.
deflects killings blame by demonizing
Newsweek," Fort Wayne
(IN) Journal Gazette, May 20, 2005. Also
posted on
Alternet,
Counterpunch,
and
Common
Dreams, May 17, 2005; and
ZNet
Commentary, May 22, 2005.
by Robert Jensen and Pat Youngblood
If there is a political playbook for right-wing conservatives these
days, it no doubt begins, “Step #1: Whenever possible, blame the news
media.”
What to do if the U.S. invasions/occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq
have sparked resistance in those countries because people generally
don’t like being occupied by a foreign power that has interests in
exploiting their resources and/or geopolitical value? Blame journalists.
That’s exactly what the Bush administration and its rhetorical attack
dogs are doing with the “scandal” over Newsweek’s story on the
desecration of the Quran at the U.S. prison at Guantanamo.
In a short item in its May 9 issue, Newsweek reported that U.S.
military investigators had found evidence that U.S. guards had flushed
a copy of the Quran down a toilet to try to provoke prisoners. This
week, the magazine retracted, saying not that editors knew for sure
that such an incident didn’t happen but that, “Based on what we know
now, we are retracting our original story that an internal military
investigation had uncovered Quran abuse at Guantanamo Bay.”
Meanwhile, after the original story ran, Afghan and U.S. forces fired
on demonstrators in Afghanistan, killing at least 14 and injuring many
others.
The conventional wisdom emerged quickly: Newsweek got it wrong, and
Newsweek is to blame for the deaths. The first conclusion is premature;
the second is wrong.
First, it’s not clear whether U.S. guards in Guantanamo or other
prisons have placed copies of the Quran on a toilet or thrown pages (or
a whole Quran) into a toilet. Detainees have made such claims, which
have been reported by attorneys representing some of the men in custody
and denied by U.S. officials. Newsweek’s retraction is ambiguous,
suggesting they believe the incident may have happened but no longer
can demonstrate that it was cited in the specific U.S. government
documents, as originally reported.
Given the abuse and torture -- from sexual humiliation to beatings to
criminal homicide -- that has gone on in various U.S. military prison
facilities, it’s not hard to believe that the Quran stories could be
true. Given that last month U.S. officials pressured the United Nations
to eliminate the job of its top human-rights investigator in
Afghanistan after that official criticized violations by U.S. forces in
the country, it’s not hard to be skeptical about U.S. motives. And
given that even the human-rights commission of the generally compliant
Afghan government is blocked by U.S. forces from visiting the prisons,
it’s not hard to believe that the U.S. officials may have something to
hide.
Until we have more information, definitive conclusions are impossible.
But if you go on a popular right-wing web site, you’ll find the verdict
that administration supporters are trying to make the final word:
“Newsweek lied, people died.”
Yes, people died during demonstrations, and political leaders in the
Muslim world have cited the Quran stories to spark anti-U.S. feeling.
But reporters outside the United States have pointed out that these
demonstrations have not been spontaneous but were well-organized, often
by groups of students. The frustration with U.S. policy that fuels
these demonstrations isn’t limited to the Quran incident, and to reduce
the unrest to one magazine story is misleading. Indeed, Gen. Richard
Myers, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said at a news conference
last week that the senior commander in Afghanistan, Army Gen. Carl
Eichenberry, reported that the violence “was not at all tied to the
article in the magazine.”
So, why the focus on the Newsweek story? It’s part of the
tried-and-true strategy of demonize, disguise, and divert. Demonize the
news media to disguise the real causes of the resistance to occupation
and divert attention from failed U.S. policies.
The irony is that the U.S. corporate news media deserve harsh criticism
for coverage of the U.S. wars in Afghanistan and Iraq -- not for
possibly getting one fact wrong, but for failing to consistently
challenge the illegality of both wars and the various distortions and
lies that the Bush administration has used to mobilize support for
those illegal wars.
We should hold the news media accountable when they fail. But we should
defend journalists when they are used by political partisans who are
eager to obscure their own failures.
-----------------------------
Robert Jensen is on the board and Pat Youngblood is
coordinator of the Third Coast Activist Resource Center in Austin, TX (http://thirdcoastactivist.org/).
They can be reached at rjensen@uts.cc.utexas.edu
and pat@thirdcoastactivist.org.
BACK
TO
FREE-LANCE ARTICLES
BACK
TO ROBERT W. JENSEN'S HOME PAGE